Home ~ Sample Wedding Ceremonies ~ Readings & Poems ~ Our Philosophy
Thank You's ~ New York State Marriage License Info ~ FAQ ~ Contact ~ Fees
Articles ~ Newsletter ~ Site Map ~ Empire State Building Valentines Day Weddings
Long Island Wedding Reception & Ceremony Locations ~ Videos
Diamond Engagement Ring: 15th Century Venice
by Charles Panati

A Venetian wedding document dated 1503 lists "one marrying ring having diamond."  The
gold wedding ring of one Mary of Modina, it was among the early betrothal rings that featured
a diamond setting.  They began a tradition that probably is forever.

The Venetians were the first to discover that the diamond is one of the hardest, most enduring
substances in nature, and that fine cutting and polishing releases its brilliance.  Diamonds, set
in bands of silver and gold, became popular for betrothal rings among wealthy Venetians
toward the close of the fifteenth century.  Rarity and cost limited their rapid proliferation
throughout Europe, but their intrinsic appeal guaranteed them a future.  By the seventeenth
century, the diamond ring had become the most popular, sought-after statement of a European
engagement.

One of history's early diamond engagement rings was also its smallest, worn by a two-year-old
bride-to-be.  The ring was fashioned for the betrothal of Princess Mary, daughter of Henry
VIII, to the dauphin of France, son of King Francis I.  Born on February 28, 1518, the dauphin
was immediately engaged as a matter of state policy, to assure a more intimate alliance
between England and France.  Infant Mary was presented with the veriest vogue in rings,
which doubtless fit the tiny royal finger for only a short time.

Though the origin of the diamond engagement ring is known, that of betrothal rings in general
is less certain.  The practice began, though, well before the fifteenth century.

An early Anglo-Saxon custom required that a prospective bridegroom break some highly
valued personal belonging.  Half the token was kept by the groom, half by the bride's father.  
A wealthy man was expected to split a piece of gold or silver.  Exactly when the broken piece
of metal was symbolically replaced by a ring is uncertain.  The weight of historical evidence
seems to indicated that betrothal rings (at least among European peoples) existed before
wedding rings, and that the ring a bride received at the time of proposal was given to her again
during the wedding ceremony.  Etymologists find one accurate description of the engagement
ring's intent in tis original Roman name,
arrhae, meaning "earnest money."

For Roman Catholics, the engagement ring's official introduction is unequivocal.  In A.D. 860,
Pope Nicholas I decreed that an engagement ring become a required statement of nuptial
intent.  An uncompromising defender of the sanctity of marriage, Nicholas once
excommunicated two archbishops who had been involved with the marriage, divorce, and
remarriage of Lothair II of Lorraine, charging them with "conniving at bigamy".  For Nicholas,
a ring of just any material or worth would not suffice.  The engagement ring was to be of a
valued metal, preferably gold, which for the husband-to-be represented a financial sacrifice;
thus started a tradition.

In that century, two other customs were established: forfeiture of the ring by a man who
reneged on a marriage pledge; surrender of the ring by a woman who broke off the
engagement.  The Church became unbending regarding the seriousness of a marriage promise
and the punishment if broken.  The Council of Elvira condemned the parents of a man who
terminated an engagement to excommunication for three years.  And if a woman backed out
for reasons unacceptable to the Church, her parish priest had the authority to order her into a
nunnery for life.  For a time, "till death do us part" began weeks or months before a bride and
groom were even united.